An article published by the Beijing Daily, the official newspaper of the Chinese Communist Party’s Beijing Municipal Committee, said the measure against TikTok is tantamount to a “robbery” that would “completely destroy American national credibility, which is already flawed”.
While both Beijing and TikTok owner ByteDance have stayed silent on potential moves, Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Wang Wenbin on Wednesday referred media inquiries to his previous remarks about the US measure against the hit short video app. Wang had said the proposed ban amounts to bullying and “will inevitably come back to bite the US itself”.
Last month, Ministry of Commerce spokesman He Yadong called on Washington to “stop unreasonable suppression of companies from other countries”.
This leaves TikTok poised to challenge the constitutionality of Washington’s sell-or-ban measure, as the four-year battle over restricting the short video app’s operations in America has turned into a significant front in the US-China tech war.
“The facts and the Constitution are on our side and we expect to prevail again,” TikTok chief executive Chew Shou Zi said in a video message posted on Wednesday, moments after Biden signed into law the legislative measure against the short video platform operator. “Make no mistake – this is a ban on TikTok.”
State-run China Daily, meanwhile, has published an article by British political and international relations analyst Tom Fowdy, who argued that the US measure was meant to “steal, undermine or impede China’s success”. “Under no circumstances will the company be allowed to sell such a wildly successful product under the threat of force to an American company,” he wrote.
One user on Xiaohongshu, an Instagram-style service popular among young Chinese, posted a question on whether it was still meaningful to pursue a job interview with TikTok. Several of the replies asserted that it was pointless.